I had a good number of my readers disagree with me when I wrote this statement in a previous article about the coming inevitability of sexbots in widespread distribution:
“Women have a biological need for regular injections of semen and quite literally go a bit crazy without it given the hormonal shot they get from them.”
Well, it turns out I was correct in my assumption. A new study conducted by the State University of New York shows the correlation between how often a woman gets a seminal injection from unprotected sex and the state of her mental health. And it’s not just vaginal sex that confers these benefits, oral sex where the woman swallows her partners ejaculate works just as well. From the Daily Mail U.K.:
“Oral sex is good for women’s health and makes you feel happier, according to a study which studied the effects of semen’s ‘mood-altering chemicals’.
It follows research which shows that seminal fluid contains chemicals that elevates mood, increases affection, induces sleep and also contains at least three anti-depressants.
The researchers also claim that women who have regular unprotected sex are less depressed and perform better on cognitive tests.
Semen contains a plethora of chemicals along with spermatozoa, including cortisol, which is known to increase affection, estrone, which elevates mood and oxytocin, which also elevates mood.
It also contains thyrotropin-releasing hormone (another antidepressant), melatonin (a sleep-inducing agent), and even serotonin (perhaps the best-known antidepressant neurotransmitter).
Given these ingredients – and this is just a small sample of the mind-altering ‘drugs’ found in human semen – Researchers Gallup and Burch, along with the psychologist Steven Platek, hypothesised that women having unprotected sex should be less depressed than suitable control participants.”
Who would have guessed that ejaculate had all those beneficial chemicals and hormones in it? If you think about it, evolutionarily it makes sense; the benefits from sex aren’t just the pleasurable parts of it. Biologically, it’s necessary for women to have regular injections of semen. And that’s just what the researchers found:
“Recent sexual activity without condoms was used as an indirect measure of seminal plasma circulating in the woman’s body.
Each participant also completed the Beck Depression Inventory, a commonly used clinical measure of depressive symptoms.
The most significant findings from this study, published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, were that, even after adjusting for frequency of sexual intercourse, women who engaged in sex and ‘never’ used condoms showed significantly fewer depressive symptoms than did those who ‘usually’ or ‘always’ used condoms.
Importantly, these chronically condom-less, sexually active women also evidenced fewer depressive symptoms than did those who abstained from sex altogether.
By contrast, sexually active heterosexual women, including self-described ‘promiscuous’ women, who used condoms were just as depressed as those practicing total abstinence.”
Hmmm, I’m seeing an interesting correlation here. When did the big push for universal condom use start? That’s right, when the AIDS outbreak first started manifesting itself. Before then, contraceptive pills were being used for the prevention of pregnancy and with the advent of modern antibiotics, contracting a garden variety STD had become a nuisance at worst. But now there was a sexually transmitted disease that could KILL you and all the authorities and experts shouted to the high heavens that condoms were the best way to prevent it. Nobody wanted to die but everybody wanted to fuck so condom usage rates skyrocketed. If I remember correctly, all this happened in the early eighties and if you think back, that’s when the sexes started increasing the rate of their inexorable decline towards the dystopic sexual market we see today.
All because women aren’t getting enough cum dumped in their buckets.
None of this is accidental, I daresay it was planned. Someone in the elites figured out long ago that women and therefore couples were happier with the female of the two getting regular doses of her partners love juices. How best to sabotage this? Make sex something you could die from and encourage men to dump their loads into balloons. The thing that bothers me about this is the premise of heterosexual sex being dangerous when all the evidence points to the contrary. Sure, you can contract something inconvenient like the herpe, but that and other STD’s generally won’t kill you.
So you women out there, want to feel better and less depressed? Dump the condoms, have lots of unprotected sex with your man and if you don’t want to get pregnant, go on the pill. Start giving your man regular blowjobs and swallow dammit. Don’t have a man? Follow the previous advice and you quickly will.
Your mental health will thank me.
Frozen semen pills for depression and sleep.
That’s the next Steve Jobs, right there!
I prefer mall kiosks, fresher product and more variety. Francis, I went through your archives, and just a question, did you ever blog under a different name? Just asking but you remind me of a good friend from not long ago.
Not me anyway. This is my first time blogging in any shape or form, though I’ve been reading various Manosphere stuff for the past year and a bit or so, without posting.
Good stuff Francis, I enjoy reading your blog.
I think they’ve been using semen extract in cosmetics for a while because its good for skin. You know, like they use baby placenta too?
They use so much weird shit in products these days, but it’s not so different from times in the past. I remember when my grandfather slaughtered a hog, he said, “Son, the only thing we don’t save is the oink”. Seems to me to be much of the same.
I think this is one of the positive influences of porn. Men used to seeing women swallow. Plus a man feels better when she swallows too.
lol
Plus it helps her feel better too. I always wondered why the girls who liked swallowing so much seemed so much happier.
Problem is women are also becoming STD factories because of having unprotected sex. Saw one at the convenience store last night. Pretty but looking at her legs, she was full of sores. Some were scabs and some were open. Nasty.
That’s the ones you just let swallow. Win-win.
Not if the sores in her mouth!
Good point.
I have an article to show wifey. LOL.
By the way if you know the dates of ovulation, you can have unprotected sex, no need for the pill and still not fall pregnant. Best time is usually just after the period stops, but the woman knows best, if they know their bodies well enough the woman even knows when ovulation actually happens.
Craig, we have to spread this finding far and wide. Got a bitchy wife? Tell her if she ingests more of your ejaculate she will be happy as hell and you have the scientific proof. If that doesn’t get you more, find someone else.
Thanks, Bill.
Did you have a good holiday mate?
Craig, I have to admit that was an original and appropriate laughing your ass off, and I’m going to steal it for future posts. Holiday was good.
WOW! I never knew that. I’m going to have to tell my wife about this!
Tell her, “If you want to be really happy…” I’ll let you fill in the rest.
lol not a bad idea
You have to read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria
“Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women”
“While physicians of the period acknowledged that the disorder stemmed from sexual dissatisfaction, they seemed unaware of or unwilling to admit the sexual purposes of the devices used to treat it.”
And for the love of god, remove the 11MB big Universe.jpg background picture.
Is the background pic that big of a pain in the ass? You’re the first to complain about it, but I’ve been a fan of the Hubble deepfield pictures ever since they started putting out extremely hi-res images of them about a decade ago. I’ll look into changing that if it is causing problems with download times. Ahh, female hysteria, I could write volumes on that. If you look at the etymology of the word therapist it quite literally becomes “the rapist”. Not something that is commonly known nor is wanted to be commonly known.
Could you elaborate more on that?
I heard jokes about that, but nothing more.
Not a lot of history documentation has been allowed to survive into our present. I think I’ll write a post on that because I’ve found some documented crazy shit they used to do between the 1850′s until almost the present day.
I have heard of therapist’s concocting devices to relieve female hysteria – which led to the invention of the vibrator.
Hysteria was a pseudo science. All it was was sexually unsatisfied women because during Victorian times men were not pleasuring their women with oral sex, manual sex and foreplay. Sexual intercourse was clinical, missionary and womens’ orgasm was not on the radar, what to speak of multiple orgasms.
Most women require more than just “pumping” to experience orgasm, what to speak of multiples.
Had Victorian men been making quality love to their women then those “doctors” would have been put out of business.
To learn more about what women need see here
http://www.onetaste.us
Nice, thanks for the link.
Hysteria was a pseudo science created to line the pockets of quacks who called themselves “doctors”.
Victorians practically criminalized masturbation, the female orgasm was unheard of in that culture, oral sex was out, manually stimulating the clitorous – out. So what you had was a bunch of ignorant and sexually repressed people. Men hired prostitutes to get their’s and women paid quacks. Rather than empower people with the knowledge of how their bodies work and how to stimulate themselves and their spouses to orgasm (and multiple orgasm), these frauds created a “syndrome” and charged a pretty penny for its “treatment”.
All bogus.
Pingback: Todd Akin and Missouri, Again | Conservative Heritage Times
If the y need regular injections then they should be willing to receive them. Or just keep acting like a cunt, whatever.
Randall, why do you think they keep acting like cunts LOL?
Go on the pill? Are you kidding? That comes with a whole slew of dangerous side effects, one (non-dangerous) one being the loss of libido. Ironic isn’t it that someone that is supposed to make sex safe is something that also decrease sex desire. Plus you have the problem of STDs.
But this study fails to take into account that the reason the (very small sample size) of women studied in it may have been happier because they were in a committed relationship in which they did not feel the need for condoms. That’s a stress reducer right there.
I’d also like to see a study done on what women’s juices do for men.
In a particular esoteric school of South Asian tradition the juice of a woman is considered of benefit for men and there are techniques they use to suck up her juice during intercourse and direct it upward through their (the men’s) bodies.
Suck up her juices through the man’s penis hole, that is. Don’t ask me how they do it, but they do.
I think that biology has us sharing fluids for a reason. I can’t believe that nature exists for it’s creations to suffer interminably. I just won’t believe we are here to just exist and not at least experience some pleasure at being born which none of us ever asked to be. Sharing bodily fluids in my opinion is sharing lives, bonding doesn’t happen without it.
” I just won’t believe we are here to just exist and not at least experience some pleasure at being born which none of us ever asked to be.”
We are here for happiness and for self actualization, which is the highest happiness.
The sharing of one’s semen is for one’s life partner whom you will raise children with. Mind you, the men practicing the technique of drawing the woman’s juices up through the penis hole is simultaneously preserving his semen and also redirecting it upward along with her juices. Semen retention is a yogic practice and is said to give high intelligence, great health and vigor.
It is thought that the loss of semen is like the loss of gold, because it is full of nutrients that is brain food for the man, and the very source of his life. A type of mystic elixer. They do not spread their seed willy nilly.
Our culture has much to learn.
“Our culture has much to learn.”
Agreed.
At first I presumed you were talking about botox, but semen works too! Thanks for bringing the article to our attention and your good analysis of it!
Thanks, I checked out your site and liked it. I’m getting ready to put out an aggregator because I own all of the relevant sites and I’ll add you to it.
Bill, I’m addressing a few points here because on the relevant threads the comments are closed.
You say in the letter to your soon2bexgf that you were the first “alpha” she had. But at the same time she “cheated” on you. So what makes you “alpha” exactly?
I put “cheated” in quotes because I don’t see how people who are not engaged, much less married, can actually “cheat” on each other. What is their to cheat on if you hadn’t made very specific commitments to stay loyal to each other for life?
I find it odd how this society takes marriage so lightly but at the same time takes dating or gf/bf so seriously. Why do you think that is?
Also on the thread about the sex bots. You and the other commenters are naive if you think sex bots are going to change women and make them want the men who use sex bots more. Sex bots will do nothing but signal to women who the real “losers” are. Its doing THEM a favor, not us.
Nobody who has read it got the real reason why I wrote the LTM(STB)EG post. Let’s just say I got the responses I anticipated, and I figured it would happen that way. As for the sexbot post, I anticipate even Alphas will buy them and probably will be the first to do so, considering that being in that demographic almost assures monetary wealth. Who wouldn’t, considering how even the most attractive women are these days and steadily worsening. Women no matter how hot will have no choice, either change or die alone.
“As for the sexbot post, I anticipate even Alphas will buy them and probably will be the first to do so”
Nonsense. Do alphas buy fleshlights now? Didn’t think so. Men who get regular sex from women don’t even masturbate. Forget about buying plastic to aid them.
That’s an interesting take, but think about it a little deeper. What’s an Alpha’s main concern? The best and most bang for the buck. I think your premise might be a little off given the choice between real pain in the ass females and a perfectly serviceable sexbot.
“What’s an Alpha’s main concern? The best and most bang for the buck.”
Really? Alpha men are self-actualizing men, leaders of other men. Sex is far from their main concern. Sex is the main concern for men who aren’t getting any.
Here’s another take on the ever allusive “alpha male” proto-type
http://www.jujumamablog.com/2012/08/10/what-is-an-alpha-male/
Fishy – I would argue that your logic is actually more in favor of Alphas using sexbots than you think. If sex is not their main concern, then I imagine the alphas would use sexbots for same or better sex than with a normal women with none of the drawbacks (until he wants kids, I suppose).
I imagine the only men left fucking women would be the betas, deltas, and all the other men who pedestalize women so much that they could not conceive enjoying a sexual experience with a machine more than with a human, due to lack of emotional intimacy and because “real men fuck real women” (or whatever shaming slogan of the day rings).
Fishy – I would argue that your logic is actually more in favor of Alphas using sexbots than you think. If sex is not their main concern, then I imagine the alphas would use sexbots for same or better sex than with a normal women with none of the drawbacks (until he wants kids, I suppose). Then the could focus on the things that really interested them, without having to worry about sex with women.
I imagine the only men left fucking women would be the betas, deltas, and all the other men who pedestalize women so much that they could not conceive enjoying a sexual experience with a machine more than with a human, due to lack of emotional intimacy and because “real men fuck real women” (or whatever shaming slogan of the day rings).
“and all the other men who pedestalize women so much that they could not conceive enjoying a sexual experience with a machine more than with a human”
now that’s just off. who wouldn’t enjoy sex more with a human than with a machine? machine sex seems so weird to me, so well, inhuman.
I admit I was engaging in hyperbole – but I imagine the first rounds of shaming against the use of sexbots will use refrains centered around the idea (human sex = better sex). The flowery language I use is what I imagine the betas would use to rationalize their choice to stick to human, even if the machine experience was better.
I imagine the alphas would fuck whoever or whatever they enjoyed the most, regardless of whether people lionize or demonize it.
I cannot say for sure that sex with robots would be better with humans – but I imagine with enough time, and enough desperation/motivation, some scientist could figure it out. With the rise of super fast computers, I think it is possible to happen within my lifetime.
Now, I think I would prefer the company of humans as I want children someday – perhaps even people’s own bodies might betray their enjoyment of robot sex due to a subconscious understand that no procreation can occur as result of robotic intercourse.
My argument is not that robot sex will be better than normal sex- my argument is that if robot sex is better than normal sex- alpha’s would be the first to take advantage of the fact, and shamelessly too.
Bill, here’s a man after your own heart. LOL
Fishy, thanks that’s my next post.